|
ICAR Homepage >
Technical Bodies >
Working Groups > Genetic Analysis WG
Genetic Analysis Working Group
Members: Paolo Ajmone Marsan (Università
Cattolica del S. Cuore, Piacenza, Italy), Elena
Genzini (Laboratorio Genetica e Servizi, Cremona,
Italy), Wim Van Haeringen (Dr. Van Haeringen
Laboratorium b.v., Wageningen, The Netherlands), M.
Winters
New member proposed: Marie-Yvonne Boscher (LABOGENA,
Jouy-en-Josas, France)
Contact person at ISAG: André Eggen, ABS
Global Inc., De Forrest, Wisconsin 53532 Introduction
information on the international state
of the art was collected through a questionnaire
disseminated thanks to the active participation of
ICAR and EAAP secretariat. The results of the survey
were shown at the 2004 ICAR meeting in Sousse. The
questionnaire gave clear indication of a worldwide
trend towards the use of molecular methods in
paternity and diagnostic analyses.
Below is a proposal of requirements ICAR should
consider for the accreditation of laboratories
performing DNA analyses. Lab characteristics are to
be tested against these and only laboratories
meeting all minimum requirements to be accredited.
The opportunity of attributing a score at lab
characteristics and the addition of a minimal
scoring threshold to be overcome for accreditation
is presently under investigation.
The key issues to be considered for accreditation
and exchange of information are the following:
-
Education, training and experience of the head of
the laboratory: a Ph. D., MSC degree with at least
two year experience or a Bachelor/University degree
with at least three year experience should supervise
the laboratory responsible for molecular analyses.
All degrees are intended in scientific disciplines
comprising courses related to DNA analysis (e.g.
molecular biology, biochemistry, molecular genetics,
chemistry, etc.)
 |
Ph. D. with one year
experience |
 |
Master with two year
experience |
 |
Bachelor with three
year experience (Minimum requirement) |
 |
Other (no
accreditation) |
-
Experience of operators: molecular analyses need
experienced operators to be correctly interpreted
and to distinguish between artefacts and real
results. At least one operator with at least two
year experience should be required.
 |
y≥5 |
 |
2≥y>5 |
 |
y≥2 (Minimum requirement) |
 |
Y<2 (no accreditation) |
-
Analytical methods (protocols and procedures,
quality checks): Homogeneity of procedures and
quality check is more important than homogeneity in
protocols, since these are generally optimised
independently by each laboratory. Nevertheless main
reagents (e.g. primers, antibodies, buffers,
amplification condition etc.) are to be described by
laboratories. A test not disclosed to third parties
and that cannot be repeated in at least one
independent lab, cannot be accredited by ICAR.
Standard procedures for 1) handling of samples, from
reception throughout the processing phase to the
storing or disposal 2) storing and retrieving of
information 2) avoiding cross-contaminations should
be clearly defined by labs. In addition, systematic
use of standard reference samples and measurement of
repeatability of results on a subset of data should
be routinely introduced in each lab.
 |
Protocol for handling of samples from arrival to
disposal |
 |
Protocol for storing and retrieving information |
 |
Protocol for control of cross-contamination |
 |
Protocol for error and repeatability checking |
-
Equipments: labs should have at least some months
experience on equipments introducing high innovation
in the way molecular analyses are accomplished. A
relevant amount of data should be produced in
duplicate using old and new technologies, to test
for the reliability of the equipment and the
appropriate training of operators. Equipment should
be regularly controlled and maintained by authorised
technical personnel.
 |
Type of Equipment |
 |
Date of purchase |
 |
Date of last revision |
-
Certification: Laboratories to be accredited
should have international or national certification
(e.g. ISO certification) and routinely follow Good
Laboratory Practices.
 |
International
certification |
 |
National certification
(minimum requirement) |
 |
No certification (no
accreditation) |
-
Participation and performance in ring-tests:
participation to ring test (national and
international) is an indicator that data quality and
quality check have a relevant importance within lab
and that the laboratory aims at implementing its
performances through comparison and exchange with
other institutions working in the same field.
Comparison may result impossible for some tests, due
to patents, not disclosure of genetic information
etc. The participation in at least two comparison
tests may be required for accreditation. Since ring
test performance represents key information for the
accreditation of laboratories, the disclosure of
performance will become a must for ICAR
accreditation. The threshold may be set quite lax
initially (e.g. 10% error rate), to become
progressively more strict.
 |
≥ 2 international ring test |
 |
< 2 international ring test |
 |
performance in international ring test |
 |
≥ 2 national ring test (minimum requirement) |
 |
< 2 national ring test |
 |
performance in national ring test
|
 |
No ring test (no accreditation) |
-
Use of recommended ISAG/FAO marker sets: The use
of a common set of markers is to be highly
recommended, since this will make comparison between
labs as well as exchange of experiences on the
behaviour and performance of specific loci possible.
Also, this will facilitate the use of a common
standard nomenclature and permit the use and
comparison of results obtained on a shared set of
standard DNA samples.
 |
ISAG marker set |
 |
Additional markers (please, specify) |
-
Nomenclature: The adoption of a standard
nomenclature is to be highly recommended, these both
for microsatellite allele calling and for disease or
production gene variants. Nomenclature should adhere
to existing official rules, when existing, or to
widely accepted rules or to nomenclature proposed by
the inventor/discoverer, in the case of new
technologies or new loci.
 |
ISAG
|
 |
Other (specify) (no accreditation) |
-
Special cases: Some assays may represent special
cases to be discussed on a case by case basis (e.g.
patented assays, confidential information, new
technologies, etc.).
Among these, in our opinion
five issues have the
highest priority, these are:
-
education and experience of supervisor;
-
experience of operators;
-
national or international certification;
-
participation and performance in ring tests;
-
use of the official nomenclature;
The Genetic Analysis Working Group suggests
following a stepwise approach and use cattle and
paternity testing as pilot assay to be harmonised
across countries and accredited to laboratories
meeting the minimum standards. Stated that the
strategy of spreading DNA standardization among ICAR
members was already approved, the task force
proposes that the following steps are therefore need
to be taken in order to have an efficient and smooth
application:
-
To request, before December 31st 2005, to every
member organizations a document stating the state of
the art of the DNA lab they are utilizing for cattle
and paternity testing with reference to the points
a, b, c, d and e.
-
At Kuopio ICAR meeting in June 2006, the
situation was reviewed by the task force, also
considering the possibility of scoring lab
characteristics and decide on a minimal scoring treshold, with proposal to standardize the cattle
and paternity testing and allowing from January 2007
only those paternity tests conformed to the points
a, b, c, d and e and, if sensible, overcoming the
minimum scoring threshold.
-
At Kuopio it was also discussed further points
to begin the harmonization among member Countries.
Those points will be then reviewed at the ICAR
meetings in 2007.
-
At the following ICAR biennial Session to be held
in 2008, new issues beyond cattle and paternity test
will be considered (other species, applications,
molecular technologies).
This page has been visited
times since 20 July 2006
Page last up-dated:
11/08/2008
|
 
|